The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate how to generate electricity by different sources in two countries namely New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
On the whole, as can be seen the difference between two countries that although coal was popular in New Zealand in both years surveyed, nuclear power was the first position in the second year in Germany.
To begin with New Zealand, in 1980, power was generated the most by coal with 56 units, followed by natural gas and hydro which were equivalent each other at 30 units while petroleum only accounted for 11 units. However, in 2010, coal still kept the same position and increased twofold at 150 units, the lowest used fuel belonged to petroleum and natural gas with 2 units in each.
Turning to Germany, even though only occupied 20 units in 1980, nuclear reached the highest point of 155 units in the last year. Meanwhile, ever ranking the first place together with petroleum with 28 units, natural gas dropped back to 2 units in the last year. Coal and petroleum changed insignificantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to landfill 74
- Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think? 78
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 73
- The bar chart shows the number of magazines sold per person in 5 countries in 3 different years. 73
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion and increased twofold at 150 units, the lowest used fuel belonged to petrole...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, while, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86516853933 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47994098915 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3255117861 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210140799628 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115271775333 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189962822942 0.0843802449381 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186024090765 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224737697971 0.0819641961636 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.