The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The aforementioned line graph below illustrates the levels of the consumption of fish and three kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef and lamb in a country in Europe over a 25 years starting 1979.
As can be seen, the use of fish, beef and lamb had a similar downward trend during the period. Meanwhile, chicken was consumed more and more over the time.
Looking at the chart, it is clear that the demand for lamb and beef dropped considerably, with the former going up and down from 150 grams in 1979 to by 60 grams per person a week in 2004 and the later, which was the first popular in 1979, sank by 110 grams in 2004 compared to over 200 grams in the first year.
On the other hand, chicken was seen a soar and reached a peak of over slight 250 grams in 2004 during the same time, contrasted to the figure of fish was the lowest point in 1979, however, this figure reduced minimally of almost 50 grams in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- Some people think that nuclear is better than other source of power for meeting ever increasing global needs To what extent do you agree 92
- Violence in the media promote violence in society. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The table shows the percentage of pupils who entered higher education from 5 secondary schools between 1995 and 2000 inclusive 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1979 to by 60 grams per person a week in 2004 and the later, which was the first ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29479768786 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22868166232 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601156069364 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.557255197 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.6 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192667212478 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101869992048 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104514934338 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124858575807 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104249136854 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.