The reading passage claims the dinosaurs to be endotherms. However, the professor, in her lecture, kept forward strong explanation in contrast to the idea presented in the passage. The professor argues that dinosaurs were not endotherms by presenting the points and casting doubt on the reason presented in the reading.
The first point the professor mentions in order to present her contrasting view to the reading is regarding the polar dinosaurs. The author of the passage argues that as the dinosaurs were found living in the cold environment they must be endotherms. However, the professor has different views. According to the professor, the polar region at that time used to be warmer than present days. The discussion about the polar dinosaurs differ in the reading. The professor further mentions that the polar dinosaurs might have migerated or even hibernated during the winter. Thus the professor's point is valid to doubt the passage.
The next thing the professor states while opposing the passage is the position of legs. The passage claims that as the legs of the animal was underneath the body, it supported efficient running so it must be endotherms. On the contrary, the professor states that the legs were positioned so as to support more weight of the animal.
Furthermore, the professor counter the next explanation made by the passage about Haversian canal in bone structure. The passage mentions that presence of this canal allows rapid growth which is the characteristics of endothermy. However, the professor claims that there was growth ring in the dinasours bone structure indicating that the growth was not constant. the dinosour being non-endotherms, experiences halt in growth during cold season.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 61
- Did the Dinosaurs endothermic ?reading passage support the statement and lecture oppose the statement by providing the reasons. question is like that summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they chal 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ading is regarding the polar dinosaurs. The author of the passage argues that as th...
^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d or even hibernated during the winter. Thus the professors point is valid to doubt ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...or states that the legs were positioned so as to support more weight of the animal. F...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ating that the growth was not constant. the dinosour being non-endotherms, experien...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, as to, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28985507246 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81767607555 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4639536973 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8823529412 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136127782203 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528169742894 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479020937295 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089352849322 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255490015768 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.