TPO 27
In this set of materials, the reading passage states several hypothesizes would be an effect on occurring little ice age about 1350 until 1900CE. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First and foremost, the reading points out that before little ice age, some glaciers were melted, and sent a lot of cold freshwater to the Gulf stream that disrupting it, so increasing earth temperature. In contrast, the lecture opposes this view by mentioning that the Gulf Stream could just affect the climate of Europe and North America. But, the little ice age occurred in southern hemispheres such as New Zealand and Africa that the Gulf Stream could not affect on. So, the Gulf Stream disruption is not a good reason for little ice age occurrence.
Furthermore, the reading argues that volcanic eruption sends a lot of dust into the atmosphere, and it would block sunlight from reaching the earth, so it could reduce Earth's temperature. Conversely, what the professor state is different. He indicates that if volcano eruption sends a lot of dust to earth to making dark clouds, local people may have seen unusual effects such as colorful sunset or brown snow. But, local people did not report these effects, and everything would be routine at that time. Hence, volcano eruption would not be explained little ice age.
Finally, according to the reading, decreasing human population and increasing number of trees would absorb CO2 from the atmosphere which decreasing greenhouse effects that keep Earth warm. However, the lecturer believes that decreasing the human population did not take enough time for growing forest. The human population quickly come back to previous situations. And, they started to cut down trees for making the field, and cultivated crops for preparing food. Thus, there was not enough time for the forests to have any effect on the climate and cause the little ice age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 461, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...d Africa that the Gulf Stream could not affect on. So, the Gulf Stream disruption is not ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivated crops for preparing food. Thus, there was not enough time for the forest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18885448916 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52729068181 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575851393189 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0522800738 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474176884155 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142489155425 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10265614919 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251586307357 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075079511776 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.