People now have freedom to work and live anywhere in the work due to the development of communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Today, thanks to the high-tech contacting and moving facilities advancement, folks are allowed to work as well as live everywhere all over the world freely. Hence, I suppose that the drawbacks are outweighed by the benefits of that development.
On the one hand, it is obvious that the distance between people is made by technology. For example, a person is far away from home can use Skype or Facebook to his family, but he just can return once or twice a year. Moreover, using the internet to maintain the contact causes less love and warmth than meeting face-to-face. In lieu of sending sweet messages and emojis, it is a lot more meaningful when we communicate directly, especially to express our feelings by kissing and hugging each other.
On the other hand, I argue that there are some upside that would be noticeable. one clear strength is that it would help us to travel, work, live and call our family whenever and anywhere we want to, so we can easily discover parts of the world, improve our languages and work in a professional environment. To illustrate, when people are recuited in a company in developed countries such as America, China, England, Japan, it means that they have truly ability required for the jobs. Doubtlessly, those people will benefit from enhancing skills, getting knowledge that they had not learnt in their countries’ schools and having high salary furthermore. Of course, they can keep contact with their relatives through the internet and come back home by convenient means of transport.
With respect to the positive aspects of the trend and living overseas, I believe that they outweigh the negative aspects on account of enrichment of knowledge and skills.
- People now have freedom to work and live anywhere in the work due to the development of communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face-to-face. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Question: In the past, when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have more opportunity to study aboard. What are the advantages and disadvatages of this development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
... to the high-tech contacting and moving facilities advancement, folks are allowed to work ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade by technology. For example, a person is far away from home can use Skype or F...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...e some upside that would be noticeable. one clear strength is that it would help us...
^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd call our family whenever and anywhere we want to, so we can easily discover pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, well, for example, i suppose, of course, such as, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 5.60731707317 571% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04561403509 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75157080407 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9374555476 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149993181825 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427988509361 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396271605205 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780372132554 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424214416282 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.