The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate a coal mine and a new form of it, a visitor attraction site.
At first, the site was functioned as a coal mine which had several facilities. In the North West side, there were situated staff engine rooms while lunch room adjoined the Southern side of it. Mine site entrance was positioned in the north and the original site was also facilitated with two Eastern waste sites, waste site 1 and waste site 2. The coal mine had also Across the waste site 2 or in the Westside a medical center was situated. The coal mine had also lorry car park that was in the South West
Eventually, the coal mine was redeveloped into a visitor attraction sites. Staff engine rooms and lunchroom were changed into a museum while mine site entrance has been replaced with tourist site entrance. In the eastern part of the site, driving and pond replaced waste site 1 and waste site 2. Then, the medical center and lorry car park have been respectively repurposed as café and car park. A walking track was added between tourist site entrance and driving circuit and in the southeast, a children playground was situated.
- In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers Why has this happened what can be done to deal with this 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in the price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 78
- The pie charts show the percentage of car ownership by make in three countries in 2015.Summarise the information by select and report the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The tables below show the forecasted and actual sales of a bicycle shop over four months.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72361809045 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40746001853 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482412060302 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4844848833 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217966937241 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110007146254 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879672869822 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206069773669 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073344036545 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.