The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given map illustrates how a coal mine turns into a tourism site.
It can be seen that the original coal mine had various sites. To the north of it was an entrance of the mine site; lunch rooms and changing rooms for staff were to the northwest and the two waste sites were situated in the east of the coal mine.
Significant changes occurred as a result of the mine’s transformation into a visitor attraction sites. Firstly, a number of buildings were repurposed. While the coal mine entrance became a visitor entrance, the dining rooms and the staff change rooms were transformed into a museum. The medical center also redeveloped to a café.
Secondly, the two waste sites were either completely overhauled, becoming a driving circuit and a pond. Both of these sites are in the east of the park.
Finally, a walking track was added between the driving circuit and the entrance. Moreover, a children’s playground was built in the southeast of the park.
- The maps the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 91
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 46
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98311132344 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6815838793 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5454545455 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196908170855 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742133885826 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664192093694 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112334419478 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763323769595 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.