Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste

Over the recent few years, it has been seen that domestic wastes are being increased day by day. As some believe that people do not reuse the household rubbish, there are some laws should be imposed by the state to reduce the domestic waste further. This essay will justifiably argue that some rules can make citizens conscious about recycling g their waste.

Everywhere around the world, wastes are seen overflowing from bin. People are not aware about this incident and almost pay least attention to environment specially in home. If people do some campaignes or seminers in respect to aware dwellers, there will never be any requirement of governments’ involvement. For example, In Bangladesh peoples are aware about enlargement of trash and try to recycle the household garbage which falls down the amount of waste eventually. So it is understandable why people donot need government interference to reducer trash.

In some countries, government take the driving rule to grow the recycling of garbage. The first and foremost reason is people have to abide by the laws of states’ to become a good citizen as well as avoid the penalty. For instance, most of the people in India throw their wastes into the roadside bin to clean the road for avoiding prompt punishment if not doing this. It is also keep the country suitable for living. The other reason is government ban the non-recycle products to increase4 recycling along with declining garbage. A recent research said that 30% of the shopkeepers are penalized due to use plastics as a carrier. As a result, using non-recycled products are going to lessen.

To recapitulate, the laws of government are badly need to keep the environment clean and safe and make people conscious about recycling garbage. This essay justified that authority should impose rules to recycle the domestic wastes by people themselves.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'kept'.
Suggestion: kept
...unishment if not doing this. It is also keep the country suitable for living. The ot...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ulate, the laws of government are badly need to keep the environment clean and safe ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12987012987 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82141923093 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8982914124 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9411764706 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37131168075 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111504250103 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05573085041 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23815520656 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232397744791 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.