Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to rapid increase in technologies is introducing a large number of vehicles as well as phenomenon of escalating population which expand these vehicles in vast amounts is growing dramatically traffic and congestions on roads so that is why it is mandatory for authorities to use wealth on railways as compared with roads. I strongly agree with the notion because trains are faster, eco friendly, helpful to cut number of traffic and congestion and cheaper.
The main reason of this perception to support this is that it is crucial for regime to spend money upon railway and not roads as trains are very faster and useful for people to consume their time in their hectic schedule. In addition to this, nowadays everyone have busy in their workloads so that is the reason it is about for them to have a shortage of times. On the other hand, if they use rails to reach their destinations than they quickly reach their within few minutes. Even though, trains are convenient and useful for masses as it decline the amount of time for going any far locations as well as humans can easily commute from one cities to another urban areas in little time periods. Furthermore, rails are eco - friendly and prevent environment from polluted as it releases less amount of steaming and other materials which can affect the global warming because private vehicles emission a majority of steams and burn fossil fuels which harmful for surrounding and polluted it. For example, metro trains which used in Delhi, Gujarat and many other metropolitan areas of India are very fast in speed as well eco-friendly because it is using energy.
The another major reason to take stand for this perspective is that if regime will expand money on rails as compared to roads than railway are necessary to decrease the traffic jam as well as congestion’s upon roads because if conditions of roads are not good than using own vehicles is neglected by humans and give preference to trains for commuting. Moreover, congestion’s and traffic jams on roads are perilous for humans and environment as sometimes it is causing of accidents so if it is reduced than many humans life will be saved. Apart from this, rails are very cheaper and help people to save their income because people own vehicles required a huge amount of wealth like maintenance of vehicles, fossil fuel for these and etcetera. For instance, in Alberta Which privacy of Canada, a majority of trains are used by humans for travelling to their work places and not own vehicles because these are cheaper and convenient for people and helpful for authorities to cut number of congestion on roads.
In conclusion, although roads are better for commuting but railways are convenient, faster, cheaper, eco - friendly for environment so that is why regime should spend money to set up railway and not roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The proportion of income adults men women children boys and girls spent on four common items in the uk in 1998 59
- In many cities today, most people live in a large apartments blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 67
- The table chart shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary schools types between between 2000 and 2009. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...increase in technologies is introducing a large number of vehicles as well as phenomenon of escal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one city', 'a city', or simply 'cities'?
Suggestion: one city; a city; cities
... well as humans can easily commute from one cities to another urban areas in little time p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 883, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...fect the global warming because private vehicles emission a majority of steams and burn ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 961, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and burn fossil fuels which harmful for surrounding and polluted it. For example...
^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to decrease the traffic jam as well as congestion's upon roads because if ...
^^
Line 9, column 523, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...accidents so if it is reduced than many humans life will be saved. Apart from this, ra...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 481.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9501039501 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6829486344 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449064449064 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4162728212 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.153846154 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819324157951 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374244373415 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477307993693 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788150652922 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561323783921 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.