Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
I agree with this point that some people think that human needs for housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. In fact not only some people, many people think only for their own need. There are several reasons why I agree with this point.
First and foremost, animals are also living creatures. After all, they have emotions and feeling like human beings. I believe that there is human dominance in the society over everything, including on animals. Moreover, the human relieve heavily on animals for food, clothes, medicines, etc. Furthermore, the animals are being used for performing experiments in laboratories.
Secondly, humans are using resources for their own needs and requirements without considering its consequences on other living beings. For example, humans are cutting down forests and transforming them into industries, agricultural lands and housing. Hence, the land for animals is reducing. Clearly, it is like creating their houses by destroying animals houses. Humans should realise that forest, trees and animals gives balance to the environment. Additionally, all the consequences from destroying these precious resources will affect lives of humans. For example, rise in temperature on earth, melting glaciers, food scarcity, etc.
In conclusion, I believe that these actions of humans are the reason for the extinction of wildlife. However, several measures have taken globally for protecting animals and their rights. Essentially, many people think of their own requirements without considering for others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, clothes, medicines, etc. Furthermore, the animals are being used for performin...
^^
Line 9, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h, melting glaciers, food scarcity, etc. In conclusion, I believe that these acti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 238.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65966386555 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78638596666 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59243697479 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7579456297 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8333333333 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2222222222 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361710531026 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114759736027 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135934958163 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241959035344 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185145972843 0.0645574589148 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.66 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.