The article discusses the benefits professor, universisty and public will have when professor appears on television and support for three reasons. However, the professor cast doubt on it and refutes each of the articles claim.
First, the article states that professor itself will benefit from appearance on television since it will help him to show his knowledge to wide public and importance of professor as scholar will increase. However, the professor doesn't think so and refute this claim by staing that apperancce on television will not be benefecial to the professor from professional perspective. Other professors will think that the profsessor is not serious about his work and will avoid him to invite for important meetings and disussion. The professor also said that he will not get funding for research.
Second, the article avers that uuniversity will have benefit since people will think highly about the university and gives donations to the university. However, the professor states that the professor will not be able to give time to university and students since most of his time will get spend on practising and traveling for the interview. Additionally, the professor will not be able to spend time on doing his research so unverisity and student will not be get benefit from it.
Third, the article mentioned that public will get chance to learn from the expert when professor appears on television. general public will able to understand the expersts opinion on issue. To refute this point the professor states that television deosn't want the disussion about serious lecture or intellectual matter. They just want the title of serious topic for headline. He also said that tv reporters itself will little bit of practice can give presentation similar to expert professor.
- Dowsing is the millennia-old practice of finding hidden things. The most well-known activity of dowsing involves the use of a device such as a forked stick to locate underground water. To this end, the dowser walks slowly back and forth over an area of gr 78
- Professor's appearance on television. 73
- Group thinking 71
- Which kind of movies do you prefer (serious ones that make you think or amusing and entertaining ones)? 70
- tidal power- integrated task 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
The article discusses the benefits professor, universisty and public will ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r will increase. However, the professor doesnt think so and refute this claim by stain...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: General
...t when professor appears on television. general public will able to understand the expe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t when professor appears on television. general public will able to understand the expersts op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int the professor states that television deosnt want the disussion about serious ...
^^
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...also said that tv reporters itself will little bit of practice can give presentation simil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24221453287 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69457988688 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6981372027 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06452816374 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214282332812 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957358381539 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770759245081 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164598880224 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553492174837 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.