When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays, the importance of education's methods has gotten lucid for everyone. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question asking individuals should do homework without the help of other students or they have to finish their tasks with each other. I agree with the opinion which is expressing children in schools should learn how to be part of a group. The reasons to substantiate my idea are explored in the following.
First of all, being in folks is an opportunity to share comments and can teach graduated and undergraduate a lot of issues about society. To put on the other hand, when persons are in a team, they realize the meaning of roles; therefore, everybody understands respecting and it is a proper event for the future of nations. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home, I had gotten familiar with bands because I was in music club during the university, now, I have worked for a violin company which holds concerts. One year ago, when I was preparing the band for participating in one of the major cities of the country, I found, I had a different attitude about a problem in comparison with one of my coworker but both of us had been in groups, in the past. As a result, we had known we should listen to each and, as a consequence, we chose the best way of solving the difficulties.
Second, many humans can support each other and enhancing the time of finding a solution. To be specific, facing bad situations, is an inevitable happening, a man or a woman has a hard condition for encountering these kinds of conditions, but, persons can start to assist and decreasing the bad results. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my brother who used to end his duties without thinking about other cooperation. Once upon a time, when he was studying his lessons for math, one of his friends told him, he had to write a paper for the history class. At first, he did not want to accept the taking part of his friend for this task but when his friend told him they are a group and he can help him in the slides of the next presentation, he consented. If my brother's friend never had explained to him the meaning of a group, he would not get the help of people, tomorrow.
By and large, I do believe folks have positive effects on the kids for later. Since they perceive the significance of each role in a team which lets them hearing the variety of thoughts also they educate for aiding all part of a country which is very good for the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 81
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site 3
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, as a result, by and large, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50884955752 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69584434795 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550884955752 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7195360466 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.882352941 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5882352941 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103517421592 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295207046957 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309249132014 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672246542267 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020431759089 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.