People learn easily from the friends beside them.
The reading and the lecture are both about iron fertilization, which is the introduction of iron into oceans in order to stimulate the bloom of plankton which absorbs carbon dioxide from the air. The author of the reading believes that this is not an effective way to halt global warming. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. she thinks that iron fertilization is a very effective way to prevent this serious problem.
First of all, the author claims that plankton does not lock away as much carbon dioxide as has previously been assumed. The reading notes that previous estimates fall short of actual amounts that will be absorbed as a result of iron fertilization. this point is challenged by the lecturer. she says that the plankton does absorb a very significant amount of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, she points out that recent studies of the phenomenon have not been carried out for long enough to accurately measure how much dangerous CO2 can potentially be locked away within the plankton.
Secondly, the author states that the process of iron fertilization results in the formation of too many dangerous toxins. It is argued that that the toxins produced can lead to very harmful phenomena like red tides. this argument is rebutted by the lecturer. she suggests that the production of toxins is not a major problem. she elaborates on this by mentioning that when global warming is no longer a threat the process can be called off and we will not have to worry about toxins any more.
Finally, the author mentions that iron fertilization can have a negative effect on eco-systems. He is of the opinion that the presence of so much plankton will favor certain species which will disrupt naturally occurring food chains. The lecturer, on the other hand, feels that the problem of global warming is much more serious than that of disrupted eco-systems. she puts forth the idea that global warming is critical to the natural environment of the entire earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Mohf89 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... effective way to halt global warming. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ubt on the claims made in the article. she thinks that iron fertilization is a ver...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to prevent this serious problem. First of all, the author claims that pla...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...bed as a result of iron fertilization. this point is challenged by the lecturer. sh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...is point is challenged by the lecturer. she says that the plankton does absorb a ve...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e locked away within the plankton. Secondly, the author states that the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...oo many dangerous toxins. It is argued that that the toxins produced can lead to very ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...very harmful phenomena like red tides. this argument is rebutted by the lecturer. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... argument is rebutted by the lecturer. she suggests that the production of toxins ...
^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...tion of toxins is not a major problem. she elaborates on this by mentioning that w...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to worry about toxins any more. Finally, the author mentions that iron f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...us than that of disrupted eco-systems. she puts forth the idea that global warming...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65056121854 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1551509168 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00877544647003 0.236089414692 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00222732611771 0.076458572812 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00918350084602 0.0737576698707 12% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00613046405898 0.150856017488 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106182752241 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.