The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of expenditure on housing , food , transport and other goods and services which Japanese and malaysian families spend money on them in 2010 .
Overall , it can be seen that the highest expenditure was in goods and services category in japan compared to housing in malaysia . the least category that people spend money on it was the health care in both countries .
As the charts show , the trend of expenditure on both given countries was relatively similar .the good and services had a greatest amount of expenditure in japan 29% while the housing consumed the highest proportion in malaysia 34% , but these percentages reflected to lower level in both countries which they were 21%of housing in japan and 26%of good and services in malaysia .
In terms of transport the people from japan spend 20% on it whereas 10% by malaysians population. The lowest category in given 2 countries was healthcare which was 6% and 3% in japan and malaysia respectively .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
| 2017-11-12 | ittovo92 | 61 | view |
| 2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 67 | view |
| 2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 67
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries. (REWRITE) 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the percentage of expenditure on housing , food , transport and other goods and se...
^^
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...centage of expenditure on housing , food , transport and other goods and services ...
^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ian families spend money on them in 2010 . Overall , it can be seen that the ...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...end money on them in 2010 . Overall , it can be seen that the highest expendi...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...in japan compared to housing in malaysia . the least category that people spend mo...
^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...japan compared to housing in malaysia . the least category that people spend money ...
^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it was the health care in both countries . As the charts show , the trend of ...
^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...both countries . As the charts show , the trend of expenditure on both given ...
^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h given countries was relatively similar .the good and services had a greatest amo...
^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...vely similar .the good and services had a greatest amount of expenditure in japan...
^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d the highest proportion in malaysia 34% , but these percentages reflected to lowe...
^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and 26%of good and services in malaysia . In terms of transport the people f...
^^
Line 13, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'malaysians'' or 'Malaysian's'?
Suggestion: malaysians'; Malaysian's
...om japan spend 20% on it whereas 10% by malaysians population. The lowest category in giv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pend 20% on it whereas 10% by malaysians population. The lowest category in given...
^^
Line 13, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd 3% in japan and malaysia respectively .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11585365854 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78047497537 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.389242452 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231210355247 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121033913191 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539574019131 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150200133574 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119339595161 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.