The graph gives information about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The graph compares the consumption of 6 different energy sources in the USA from 1980 with projection until 2030. The units are measured by Quadrillion.
Overall, the demand for energy in the US will continue to grow throughout the period, while most of American energy needs are met by fossil fuels.
At the beginning of the period, Patrol and oil consumed was 35q while this figures for coal and natural gas stood at 15 and 20q , respectively. In spite of some fluctuation in these resource consumptions, all of them experienced a gradual growth for 35 years. oil consumed in 2015 is nearly 40q whereas consumption of two others is similar and reaches 25q. prediction shows natural gas consumption remained at this level until last year of given period, by contract a growth of 5q is anticipated for oil and coal.
In 1980, the perpotion of consumption of renewable and nuclear source was very low, approximately 4q. From 1980 until now, consumption of energy which was generated from atomic source has risen by 4q while this rising for renewable energy is 1q. Despite increasing and decreasing in Hydropower consumption, now this consume about 1980 figure(4q). It is predicted that this trend will continue for next 15 years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-30 | mohammad.iraf | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that if people are allowed to work after the age of 60, it could causeproblems. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent energy sources in the USA from 1980 with projection until 2030. The units ar...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgy needs are met by fossil fuels. At the beginning of the period, Patrol a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., Patrol and oil consumed was 35q while this figures for coal and natural gas stood ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...coal and natural gas stood at 15 and 20q , respectively. In spite of some fluctuat...
^^
Line 13, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oil
...erienced a gradual growth for 35 years. oil consumed in 2015 is nearly 40q whereas ...
^^^
Line 13, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Prediction
... two others is similar and reaches 25q. prediction shows natural gas consumption remained ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...q is anticipated for oil and coal. In 1980, the perpotion of consumption of...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing in Hydropower consumption, now this consume about 1980 figure4q. It is predi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08252427184 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81338654958 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.806905366 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239561144596 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096029519738 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146701577475 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183633698501 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16484990604 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.