physical books are useless because of e-books.
The discussion on whether library books are losing its importance as more informations available online is a debatable topic and people all around the globe are divided into their opinions. The subject attracts a majority of views and remain a hot topic among the people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinise my point of view by providing some relevant examples and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
At the outset there are myriad of persuasive arguments in favour of my instance. The most preponderant one lies in the fact that library books are the authentic sources of information on which people can rely to learn and understant to core of the subject. To get an authentic reflection it is advisable to reference any books while writing a report or assignment compared to online informations, because the internet provides a load of unwanted information without being specific to the topic. The most impecceble example that can provided is the survey done on the university students, which suggests that 70% of the students with excellent grade use the library books instead on online journals.
Those who disagree have a cogent notion and could assert that e-books are the best from the perspective of gaining more informations at their own confort. Another angle on the debate suggests that the people living in remote areas can now learn through these online resources to because it is not possible to get access to the paper books. The most pertinent example that could be provided here is the books on an Autism can be downloaded in the developing countries because the delivering process is tricky and takes longer time.
To conclude, after considering above stated points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that if it is acessible physical books are more handy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Munalawoju | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09395973154 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76462822575 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8661922455 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 7.25397266985 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188219480905 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607707762309 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453692437487 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108515399961 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482159019181 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.