Some people believe that technology has made man more social and others think that it has made people less social. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Over the course of years, manners of interaction have changed a great deal. Some people consider that technology allows them to be more social while others believe that it has reduced human interaction. Whereas, I believe that technology has permitted people to socialize with ease regardless of distance and amount of time.
It is believed by a school of thought that due to advent of technology, people can interact with others more often than before. Since having access to mobile phones and internet, they keep themselves in contact with their beloved ones conveniently which was almost impossible in the past. Due to unavailability of mediums, such as landlines, emails and mobile phones, people used to develop limited communication, however, now they can talk and see each other through various applications, for example, FaceApp, WhatsApp, Messenger and many more. The fast, convenient and widely available sources of communication have made socializing quite easier than before.
On the other hand, other school of thought consider that technology is the cause of reduced social gatherings. In the past, when technology was not this much advanced and common, they used to have more communal gatherings than these days. Unlike the past, leisure time activities have transformed from socializing face-to-face to staying busy on the internet. This, consequently, has shrunk social activities and live human interaction.
In my opinion, technology has brought changes into type of relationship. People prefer to communicate with their relatives, friends through gadgets like phones instead of meeting them in person. Moreover, they are more into making friends with people by having interaction online. So, technology has changed kind of relationships, and it has neither increased social interaction nor decreased. Instead, it does not consume time and energy in connecting with your friend and relatives.
To conclude, while people have shifted their reliance from physically held meetings to online communication, it has altered nature of relationships due to mediums. There is no difference in the level of socializing, but only mediums have switched. Instead of blaming technology, there is a need to appreciate convenience and comfort brought by it, especially in communication with others.
- Write a letter to a friend telling him/her that you’re going back to your home town and you want to give him/her some furniture. Please say– why you thought about him/her– describe the furniture– suggest a way for him/her to get it 73
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- There have been some problems with the bus service, especially its reliability, in your area over the last two weeks.Write a letter to the manager of the bus company. In your letter• describe what the problems are• explain how these problems are 81
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student.However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find itvery difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In your letterdescribe the situatio 73
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58640226629 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98448077369 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57790368272 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4937835347 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.789473684 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272945670755 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851171646145 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766994840406 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154737785249 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822825454546 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.