it is easier for children to choose a career that similar to their parents?
Recently, the concept of choosing a career has become very crucial. Some people believe that it is better for children to opt for a career that is similar to their parents; however, there is another substantial body of evidence claims that youngsters should choose a career according to their desires. From a personal perspective, teenagers should have the right to attain a job that they are interested in given that they will be less stressful and more successful.
The first and foremost point, provided that young people do not follow their desired career, they could fail in the future. For instance, parents in developing countries, such as Egypt usually push their kids to pursue their own careers. They usually force their kids to be physicians or pharmasists in order to have a guaranteed future; even though, their kids may be engaging more in arts or literature rather than biology or chemistry. As a result, these kids will live a mysterious life because they attain an unfavorable career. In addition to that, most of these kids could not achieve any success; however, kids who choose a satisfying occupation build up their future with prosperity. Consequently, it is very significant for children to love their own careers.
Next, coupled with failure, stress is another drawback of following parents' careers. A vivid example of that, children in China who fail to comply with their parents' careers are more likely to commit suicide given that their parents put them under severe tense and pressure. To put it in another way, kids could not afford this stressful atmosphere; so they could not fulfill their assigned tasks. On the other hand, provided that parents know that their kids are different and unique, they could show them what they are good at rather than impose their own decisions on children. As a result, children will not feel overwhelmed, and the career will move in a flow.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, children should opt for their career according to their interests, not according to their parents' jobs. It is suggested that youngsters compromise on choosing a satisfying career, yet a profitable.
- the stricter regulation for handling and storing coal ash 73
- do you agree or disagree? employees should work fast and risk doing mistakes rather than work slowly and make sure everything is correct? 76
- do you agree or disagree? the internet provides people with valuable information, other think access to so much information creates problems? 90
- tpo 21 76
- people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than from traveling to foreign countries? agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...areer according to their desires. From a personal perspective, teenagers should h...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...se on choosing a satisfying career, yet a profitable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a satisfying career, yet a profitable.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08988764045 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65786748413 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51404494382 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0143075413 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430863826403 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151126004498 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108926336008 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304427248754 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544928865781 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.