The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Given are two maps comparing the appearance of a public park from its first year of opening in 1920 and today.
A brief analysis of the figures reveals some striking alternations in the park, including changes in seat locations, adding and removing of some facilities.
To begin regarding the entrance, there is not any considerable changes except providing a new entrance from an underground car park which is situated in the right corner of the Eldon street. Besides, there were three rose gardens in three different sites in the year 1920. However, one of them is completely deleted, the other one on the top right of the figure is supplanted by a cafe. Moreover, the pond for water plants is being substituted by a ground for children's play.
Also, Stage for musicians and the fountain are replaced by an amphitheatre for concerts and rose garden respectively. It is also interesting to note that seats surround the rose garden area in the middle of the park. The final significant change is being done on glasshouse, removing it and constructing a beautiful water feature.
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 84
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 87
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. 78
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today. What are the causes of this problem, and how could the situation be improved? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95604395604 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83173934814 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3354333033 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17274450264 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682907865041 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103671503029 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12935252055 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12483244724 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.