Visual spatial intelligence
According to the lecture, professor illustrates visual-spatial intelligence by explaining its importance in the game of chess. Furthermore, he states some examples in the chess game that it related to the visual-spatial intelligence. Generally the points in the lecture proves the points in the reading.
First, the lecture state the chess masters can draw a picture of chessboard they have seen for just a moment, if the pieces are set in meaningful position. Thus, this shows the clues in the reading that people with visual-spatial intelligence are able to perceive patterns and draw objects after seeing them for only a short time.
Second, the lecture believes that a blindfolded chess player has to remember the movements of the chess pieces and hold a picture if the chessboard into the mind. Also, this issue explain in to the reading that people with visual-spatial intelligence have the ability to create and transform mental imagery.
Third, the lecture states that chess players remember plan, strategies and patterns of reasoning of important games that they have played. This subject proves in the reading because this matter explain that people with visual-spatial intelligence have superior visual memory and the ability to predict and plan ahead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-18 | meet96301 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 68 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 68 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, third, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95329900281 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.854711972 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361225505296 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172338345398 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159545546222 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253056426983 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060844553698 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.