Opinions are divided on whether businesses should recruit old people because they have much working experience or whether it brings more benefits to hire young people. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in the essay below before my view on this matter is drawn in the end.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why the employers should hire old people. Firstly, old people have worked for many years so they have accumulated working experience. This might allow them to cope very well with problems related to interpersonal communications both inside and outside of the company. Thus, it will bring the success to the firm they work for. Secondly, their years of experience in the workplace give elderly people the confidence, which helps them not to hesitate to share their recommendations and valuable ideas with managers. As a result, the enterprise will work more efficiently.
On the other hand, I understand why some people believe that the firm should employ young people. From their point of view, younger people are more willing to learn new things and are not burdened by previous experience and ways of doing things. Therefore, the business will not take too much time and effort to train their new staff. Another point to be made is that young people are brought up in the digital and internet age. This help them can absorb the technology at a higher pace, which leads to the fact that innovation and change take place in organizations.
In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that it is more beneficial to employ young people.
- Goods transported in UK (1974-2002). 56
- The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005 33
- Many business meetings and discussions are happening online nowadays.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Nowadays the unemployment rate is on the rise. What are the causes? What can be the solutions? 56
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problem if it is not managed correctly. Do you think that benefits of tourisms outweight its drawbacks? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91011235955 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55031154761 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4917678039 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332703674253 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110721285604 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947473730358 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191604049675 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822332778715 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.