Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold the view learning local history will bring more benefits than world history for students. From my perspective, I think both local and world history have vital roles, therefore, should be equally interested in.
It is true that there are various advantages of studying local history. Firstly, students will have proper insight into national history and cultures. To be more specific, students are equipped with knowledge about how ancestors fought against intruders to reclaim independence. Besides, they will understand about living styles, traditional moral values and customs. Another reason worth mentioning is that students will take responsibility for developing their nations. When they realize the importance of origin of the country, they will take actions to maintain and preserve national values and improve themselves to contribute to country’s development.
Nevertheless, I would argue that learning world history bring some certain advantages. The first reason to be given is that it helps students have a more comprehensive background of knowledge. Studying and teaching knowledge about historical events on a global scale allow students gain understanding about different aspects of life. Secondly, the globalization is popular trend worldwide, which require people to have wide knowledge foundation to integrate into the modern world. In fact, if students have knowledge about world history, they will not get cultural shock when travelling or studying abroad. Also, this helps students increase the chance of getting good jobs at the international companies and reinforces relationship at work places.
In conclusion, for the reasons above, I believe that students should study both local and world history equally.
- The diagram shows the consumption of renewable energy in the USA from 1949-2008. 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 57
- The Processes below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 53
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7816091954 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88572140549 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8288451 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277164585608 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964924281588 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851416661209 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193933443948 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778545551186 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.