The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British people raising money for charity by 5 different age groups in 2 years 1990 and 2010.
In general, it can be seen that the while the percentage of British people donating money to charity decreased for all age groups, the opposite was true that for age group 51-61 and over 65. Besides, the proportion of contributors in the age group 18-25 was the smallest both 2 years.
To begin with, the period between 1990 and 2010 witnessed a sharp decline in 18-25 donors of 10% from 17% in 1990. Age group 26-35 and over 65 had the similar figures for British people donating money to charity, approximately 32% each in 1990. Over the next 10 years saw a gradual decrease in donors of group 26-35 of 7% to 24%. In contrast, the figure for group over 65 slightly grew by 3% to 35% in 2010.
Moving on, with regarding to remaining categories, the proportion of contributors in the age group 36-50 was the highest in 1990 at 42%, but later declined moderately to 35% in 2010. However, starting from 35% in 1910, the figure for 51-65 climbed slightly to reach the peak of 39% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-08 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Marita | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph: Consumption of Fast Food in the UK 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- TOPIC: Everyone should stay in school until they reach 18. Do you agree/disagree? 56
- The picture illustrates the university application process. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, regarding, while, in contrast, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60784313725 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47040829566 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1569209618 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298202635672 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143298305424 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118636325539 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23082039135 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118148195479 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.