TPO 12 | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

TPO 12

The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributed to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her. The lecture, on the other hand, explains that the shreds of evidence provided by the reading is not convincing regarding the validity of the painting and refutes each of the reasons stated by the author.

First, the reading explains that the family of Jane Austen has approved of the painting; that is, the subject of the portrait is indeed her. However, the professor refutes this point by mentioning that jane Austen passed away seventy years ago. Therefore, his currently alive relatives and descendants could not have seen her in person to authorize the painting.

Second, the article mentions the resemblance between the authorized sketch and the published full-length painting, that is both of them are depicting the famous novel writer. However, the lecture contends that the subject of both paintings could be one of jane's relatives. He mentions that the Austen family was a large one, and any of her cousins could look like her. In fact, some are to believe that the subject is one of jane's descendant niece.

Third, the reading uses the painter, Ozias Humphry, as the evidence, that is the affluent family of Austen was among those who could afford such an expensive artist. Also, the painting style of the portrait is similar to Humphry's style. The lecturer opposes this point by stating that the method is the only evidence for this limited claim, whereas there are pieces of evidence that the painting could have not to be created in the time that Jane was a teenager. This is because the background canvas was not available in Austen's town by the time she was twenty-seven, and no longer a teenager. So, the painting is, at its best, a few years younger than what the author states.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-04-27	sonyeoso	80	view
2021-12-13	shayanhgh	70	view
2021-07-10	megha tomar	70	view
2020-01-21	shayanhgh	66	view
2020-01-21	shayanhgh	73	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Integrated TOEFL Writing

Essays by user mahyaj98 :

TPO 39 3
TPO 43 80
TPO 41 70
TPO 12 73
TPO 11 85

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4927.0 1373.03311258 359% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 618.0 270.72406181 228% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.97249190939 5.08290768461 157% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98594081286 4.04702891845 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.6542283033 2.5805825403 180% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.312297734628 0.540411800872 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1251.9 419.366225166 299% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.55342163355 129% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 44.0 21.2450331126 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 349.157594089 49.2860985944 708% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 351.928571429 110.228320801 319% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.1428571429 21.698381199 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0626428310526 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781683689055 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621418138346 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840284664771 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487460676766 0.0443174109184 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.2 13.3589403974 286% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -7.02 53.8541721854 -13% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 18.2 5.55761589404 327% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.2 11.0289183223 228% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 29.83 12.2367328918 244% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 63.6247240618 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 38.0 10.7273730684 354% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.498013245 187% => OK
text_standard: 38.0 11.2008830022 339% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.