TPO 12
The reading states that the painted portray is famous English novelists Jane Austin and provide three reason for it. Contrary, the professor do not agree with the reasons and say the mentioned reason can hardly proof thi subject.
First, the reading states that the family of Austen gave permition to use this portray as an illustration of her letters. The Austen's family claim that this painting is Asuten. In contract, the professor explain that the Austin died 70 years ago. Therefore, the authorization is not a valid point since today the Austen' family do no know what Jane look like. So, Austen's family did not see him in a long time and they did not how she look like and can not say this painting is look like her.
Second, based on the reading, the sketch of Cassandra painting is very similiar to the finded painting and its overall shape of the face is very much like the portrait. However, the professor claim that it is possible that the person in the painting be a cousin of Jane Austen. Since Austin had a lot of cousin after that, it is possible one of them resemble Jane Ausen' face and be like her.
Third, the article claims that there is evidence that the painting which do not have a sign and date, is painted when Asuten was a teenager. Nevertheless, the lecturer explain that stamp and canvas of the painting did not exist in london that time. When this kind of canvas came to london Asuten was 27 year old and because of that we can conclude the young person in the paining is not Austen since she was older in that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Jane) must be used with a third-person verb: 'looks'.
Suggestion: looks
... the Austen family do no know what Jane look like. So, Austens family did not see hi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cousin seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cousins'.
Suggestion: a lot of cousins
...cousin of Jane Austen. Since Austin had a lot of cousin after that, it is possible one of them ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22351453797 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3669785704 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397469188482 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141492223561 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861491534056 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213296781756 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979981891684 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.