The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart elucidates the information about the gender allocation of instructors who were appointed in 6 various kinds of educational establishments in the UK in 2010. As illustrated by the chart, nursery and elementary schools welcomed the largest number of female teachers, but when it comes to higher education level, it was the counterpart that dominated.
Apparently, the proportion of women was higher than that of men in some types of junior educational setting. To specify, there were above 95% of women appointed to the teaching position in nursery or pre-school as well as primary ones compared with much lower figures for men. Similar was the scenario in secondary school level that the share of female educators was 53%, slightly higher than the corresponding ratio for males.
The college establishments witnessed the equal gender distribution of teachers, sharing the percentage 50%. Nevertheless, the ratio of men surpassed that of women when it comes to the rest of the categories. In detail, the dominance of male lecturers was obviously seen in university level where the proportion stood at roughly 70%. With regard to the other type, private training institutions, the figure for men appointed to teaching position was nearly 57%, which summarily featured the prevailing appearance of males in high educational settings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | quynhthi2001 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Nguyen My | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | m.nourbakhsh | 100 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | Thykeppy | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 89
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 67
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was the counterpart that dominated. Apparently, the proportion of women was ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an the corresponding ratio for males. The college establishments witnessed the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of males in high educational settings.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3820754717 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02625864179 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1691488575 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12986486423 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054455019663 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409062940624 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963487437843 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424994957747 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.