In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects
is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack
a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider
range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely
to possess. Also, because of the number of people involved and the greater
resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task
assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and
issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is
more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This
is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members
and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out
to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the
team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel
better about carrying out the work that is entailed by that decision than they
might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team
member has a much better chance to "shine," to get his or her contributions
and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a
team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than
what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or
contribute working alone.
<p class="MsoNormal">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU">The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the
group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the
passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what
happened for real. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU">First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn't work hard but
gotrecognition for the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who
worked hard was not given recognition they should have got. In other words,
they weren't given the oppotunity to "shine." This derectly
contradicts what the passage indicates.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU"> Second, groups were slow in
progress. The passage says that groups are nore responsive than individuals
because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources.
However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower
than individuals in dicision making. Groups needed more time for meetings,
which are neccesary procceedures in decision making. This was another part
where experience contradicted theory. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU">Third, influetial people might emerge, and lead the group towards glory
or failure. If the influent people are going 1n the right direction there would
be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is
nobody that has enough influ</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU">e</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:
11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ansi-language:EN-AU">nce to counter the decision
made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the
influential party as the leader, and might be less flexible in thinking. They
might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.</span><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-ansi-language:
EN-AU"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
</p>
- Living independently or living with parents 61
- amphibian spread measures 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- Secondly, the article posits that because of this change more people will get jobs to cover up the work left by the employees. However, the lecturer is against this idea and says that the company will have high expectations from the new employees to do th 73
- The following were written in response to the task "Working in Teams" on pages196to198.
Grammar and spelling errors:
^^^^^^^^Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Group
...rch conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says th...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Happened
...what inaccurate when compared to what happened for real.
Line 19, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e members got free rides. That is, some didnt work hard but gotrecognition for the ...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gotrecognition
...es. That is, some didnt work hard but gotrecognition for the success nontheless. This also i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Worked
.... This also indicates that people who worked hard was not given recognition they sho...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 6, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...should have got. In other words, they werent given the oppotunity to 'shine.&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 35, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Progress
...os;> Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are nore ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 37, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... are nore responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and th...
^^^^^^^
Line 41, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Than
...irm found out that groups were slower than individuals in dicision making. Groups ...
^^^^
Line 41, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...irm found out that groups were slower than individuals in dicision making. Groups ...
^^^^
Line 41, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “than” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...irm found out that groups were slower than individuals in dicision making. Groups ...
^^^^
Line 43, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Groups needed more time for meetings, which are neccesary procceedures in decision ...
^^^^^
Line 45, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...ecision making. This was another part where experience contradicted theory.
^^^^^
Line 45, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecision making. This was another part where experience contradicted theory.
^^^^^
Line 53, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...rge, and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are goi...
^^
Line 53, column 13, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going 1n the ri...
^^
Line 55, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Be
...ng 1n the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go ...
^^
Line 67, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Made
...-AU'>nce to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn i...
^^^^
Line 69, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Influential
...ht turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and might be less ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3003.0 1373.03311258 219% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 10.6489361702 5.08290768461 210% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 15.5678056129 2.5805825403 603% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 419.366225166 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.6 1.55342163355 167% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 143.815529991 49.2860985944 292% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.2 110.228320801 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 34.0 4.09492273731 830% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 19.0 4.19205298013 453% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0337468233234 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034986540707 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390254551315 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0245964470765 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381207733117 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.1 13.3589403974 285% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -31.39 53.8541721854 -58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.1 11.0289183223 200% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 44.49 12.2367328918 364% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.