In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects
is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack
a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider
range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely
to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater
resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task
assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and
issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is
more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This
is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members
and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out
to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team.
Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better
about carrying out the work that is entailed by that decision than they might
doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team
member has a much better chance to “shine,” to get his or her contributions
and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a
team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than
what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or
contribute working alone.
The article and the lecture are both about new projects is to assemble a group of people in to team. The author of reading feels that its give more advantages doing team work. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks that it will get several disadvantages while working as team.
First of all, the author argues that while working as team, there are many wide range of knowledge expertise and skills from group of people. The article notes that numbers of people involved can get greater output in the project. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He claims all the group members didn't get involved throughout the good output. Furthermore, he says that can't identify the real contributors who have response to project.
Secondly, the author suggests that if individual team member has chance to shine to get his contribution but overall result have grater impact than person working alone. Moreover, the article says that the team members who have a voice will make decision and it make better work. The lecturer debuts this argument. He suggests that team members who has voice get decision and they will be carrying the work. He notes that they ignore the silent team members and at last if project fail, all the group members get the blame.
- Every year, forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice of removing dead trees from aff 70
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projectsis to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attacka project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a widerrange of knowledge, exp 65
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 66
- Essay topics: In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the 63
- Essay topics: The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze A 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s give more advantages doing team work. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...allenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks that it will get severa...
^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...cturer. He claims all the group members didnt get involved throughout the good output...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... good output. Furthermore, he says that cant identify the real contributors who have...
^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... have a voice will make decision and it make better work. The lecturer debuts this a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33363388462 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0993487933 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8571428571 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233768325383 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863600783121 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878568763946 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177139978638 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459902166235 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.