Essay topics: In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States —birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.
First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats.
Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats as more and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline.
Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use of chemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. So pesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
The article and te lecturer are both about influence of decline of birds population in USA. The author of reading feels that population, agriculture and pesticide use much harm to birds population. The lecturer challenges the claims the made by the author.T he lecturer thinks that that reasons are not harmful to the decreaseing birds population.
First of all, the author argues that human population and settlements continue to expand, birds habitats will contie to disappear. The article is mentioned that natural and traditional areas will give to make homes, malls and offices, the birds population that depend on those vanishing habitats. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He claims the many birds live in the urban and large human population areas. Furthermore, he says pigeon hokes, folken birds are live in those urban areas.
Secondly, the author suggest that increase the agriculture and expand the lands for agriculture also destruction of bird habitats. The article notes that more and more widlerness araes conver to agriculture use.T he lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggsts that USA has less land for agriculture. He elaborates on this mentioning that the few lands use for agriculture, there use new verity of crops and they give more foods to human and birds.
Finally, the author states that pesticides indirectly influnece poison to birds. Moreover, birds eat poisoned insects or drink contamined water can die birds. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that traditional was and much less pesticide use for crops. He notes that mostly use more pesticide resistant crops and they wan't threatent to birds.
- Every year, forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice of removing dead trees from aff 70
- Essay topics Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its s 86
- Essay topics: Successful people try new things and risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well 60
- TPO 3 Integrated Essay 3
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projectsis to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attacka project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a widerrange of knowledge, exp 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luence of decline of birds population in USA. The author of reading feels that po...
^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cide use much harm to birds population. The lecturer challenges the claims the made...
^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...enges the claims the made by the author.T he lecturer thinks that that reasons ar...
^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e to make homes, malls and offices, the birds population that depend on those vanishi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...lerness araes conver to agriculture use.T he lecturer rebuts this argument. He su...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26996197719 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70034799796 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520912547529 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4725887482 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.625 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240702198879 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843799509754 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048830702555 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149313949723 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289537918195 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.