The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012.
The line graph compares how many armed robberies, assaults and murders were committed in London from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, the number of armed robberies reported decreased significantly over the entire period, while assault cases increased. The figure of murder incidents remained relatively stable. It is also noticeable that at the start of the period until 2006, armed robbery was the most common recorded crime and in the following years, it was replaced by assault cases.
The number of committed cases for armed robberies started at just under 3,500 in 2003, then it rose slightly to peak at just over 3,500 in the following year. The figure declined every year and dropped to a low of approximately 1,000 in 2008, then subsequently climbed to nearly 1,500 until 2012.
On the other hand, the amount of assaults that transpired in 2003 was about 2,400, after which it fluctuated slightly for the succeeding 5 years when the lowest number of cases was noted, before rocketing up to just over 2,500 in the final year. Murder's figure hovered around 500 to 1000 throughout the entire period.
- The charts below give information about the amount and types of water in the world and also tell the use of water in three countries 77
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 87
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
- The diagrams below show the house designs for cold and warm climates 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07103825137 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49465372388 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7425723752 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127632710437 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567634185222 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691502109823 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967660147737 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783323533802 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.