The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The table compares the proportion of people aged 65 and over in Canada, Germany and the UK in 1988, 2000 and projected figures in 2030.
Overall, the number of the aging population in all countries is anticipated to increase from 1988 to 2030. The highest percentage of elderly people can be seen in Germany and this will remain the highest number in 2030, while the UK comprised the smallest proportion over the period given.
Between 1988 and 2000, Germany and Canada's population of people aged 65 and more rose by roughly 5% to 25.32% and 20.67% respectively. In the UK, the figure had relatively little change with just under 15% in both years.
By 2030, the population of elderly people in the three countries is expected to grow by approximately 5.5%. The number of people aged 65 and above in Germany and Canada will rise to 30.40% and 26.35% respectively, whereas in the UK it is forecast to climb at just over a fifth.
- Some people believe that no homework should be given to children. Others, however, say that extra work is needed after school in order for them to succeed. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 80
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
- In recent years, many small shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this positive or a negative statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76829268293 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58250963949 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4848473311 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173880500147 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859053903193 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330437125382 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11330932061 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249131603202 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.