School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources, such as the Internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that teachers are the prime source of education for primary school and university students, and they reap the most useful wisdom at educational institutions rather than other methods such as world-wide-web and television. I agree with this notion to a certain extent because human interaction plays a vital role in learning. However, technology has become an indispensable part of the study for several reasons.
To embark upon, undeniably, a person gains real-life expertise from the mentors as they are being experienced individuals, can make their pupils understand crucial lessons with ease by giving real-life examples. Moreover, when it comes to learning, every person has a distinct cognitive level. So a professor can guide every student according to their level of absorbing information which a machine or internet can not do. Not to mention that study at the school is a two-way discussion where a learner can ask questions to clarify their dilemmas, While it is unlikely in the case of technologies. For instance, if cyber-space and television are the best teachers, most of the people in this world would be well educated.
On the other hand, the internet has proved to be a boon for students as it is a sea of knowledge. Although they can not obtain comprehensive knowledge from the world-wide-web, there are myriad websites and videos accessible online that assist them in preparing college projects as well as exams. Not only this but also children acquire several real-life lessons from the television reality programs and start perceiving various skills from a very young age. To cite an example here, these days, many television shows are particularly intended for children learning.
To conclude, even though the internet and television keep scholars abreast of numerous valuable information and are the reference of various topics, the significance of human communication is invincible for grasping matters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-12 | marukap | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | randhawa.harpreetk91@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources, such as the Internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams ratherthan through continual assessment.What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment? 73
- Some people spent a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this is a good or bad thing? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they are being experienced individuals, can make their pupils understand crucial...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99052588463 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0723520886 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197942630938 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567108978058 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498413697774 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10082737152 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468004760281 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.