In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States, birds in particulare. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the effect on human activities and its population growth on the decline of birds population. With this in mind, the author states that the number of birds will be more and more decline with continuing development that occure by human. The professor, on the other hand, contradicts three arguments mentioned in the passage, believing that none of them are convincing.
First, the reading selection points out that the expantion of human settlement will continue the distruction of birds' natural habitats and consequently the reduction of birds population. Conversely, the professor makes it clear that although some kinds of birds population will be reduced, there are some other birds that will experience an increase in their population. this is because they have better and larger area to live in the human settlements.
Second, the writer claims that increase in agricultural activities will result in more destruction of bird habitats as people try to develop the agriculture. Therefore, the population of birds will face a dramatic and countinuous decline in future. However, the speaker explains that the truth is every year less and less land use for agriculture due to the new crops cultivation which no need to destruction a lot of lands.
Finally, While the author argues the effect of chemical pesticides on the reduction of birds' reproducing, the lecturer explains that the traditional pesticides were harmful for birds but this problem is solved now. She says that now the geneticaly pest resistance crops are cultivated which have no harm for birds at all.
- tpo 27 83
- Both the reading passage and the lecture argues the idea of sending humans to Mars. With this in mind, the author states that there are several problems which could be solved in this project. On the othe hand, the lecturer claims that although this projec 78
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States, birds in particulare. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
- TPO 46 3
- TPO- 42 integrated 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rience an increase in their population. this is because they have better and larger ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...face a dramatic and countinuous decline in future. However, the speaker explains that the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...land use for agriculture due to the new crops cultivation which no need to destructio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28735632184 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83048164995 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0703926065 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202283238912 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772507103735 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03507992221 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122448836922 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261788166336 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.