Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than expecting individuals to take responsibility. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
No issue in recent years has drown as much attention as the debate surrounding environmental protection. Although, everyone’s responsible is helping to protect environment, however, I agree with the idea that governments accompanied by enormous corporation are accountable for addressing these problems.
To commence, the first point to support this idea is that governments can help solve environmental issues by enacting strict laws. Firstly, they could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. Secondly, by imposing “green taxes” on drivers and airline companies, people would be encouraged to use public transport, therefore producing emissions are reduced. Furthermore, governments also should enforce laws to ban using non-biodegradable packaging that neglecting this matter can cause irreparable damage to the environment. Since a vast number of people are oblivious to the consequences of damaging the environment, governments should raise public awareness about the subsequences of threatening the environment.
For business, large or small, taking environmental consequences seriously can impel them to improve their production lines, make optimal use of materials and ending to dump waste. Meanwhile, factories by adaption of environmentally friendly equipment, for instance, can decline waste, minimize pollution and at the result eliminate the environmental damaging. Hence, customers are more likely to benefit from products made from an environmentally conscious business and free of pollutants.
Individuals, in addition, are responsible for the impact they have on the environment. They should take public transport or cycling that are totally sustainable form of transport rather than driving. They also should be stimulated to preserve the environment by recycling waste.
To summarize, cooperation between governments and large firms is necessary in looking after the environments. By collaborating with each other, countries are able to protect the environment with measures that are mentioned above. However, we cannot deny the mankind’s role.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | Milan Desai | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | mansoureh | 89 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 78
- You have a Facebook friend living in another country and s/he is curious to learn about a major news item in your country.Write a letter to your Facebook friend. In your letter•describe a news story in your country•explain why people are interested in 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 89
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- In Many Countries Small Shops And Town Centers Are Going Out Of Business Because People Tend To Drive To The Large Out Of Town Stores This Results In An Increase In Car Use And It Also Means That People Without Cars Have Limited Access To Out Of Town Stor 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'drowned'.
Suggestion: drowned
No issue in recent years has drown as much attention as the debate surroun...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09708737864 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.379440444 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637540453074 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1086925689 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175257117761 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539729249478 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372131872357 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904309051091 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246511250161 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.1 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.