Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is important to consider that television today has myriad of channels, unprecedented than ever before. Few folks imply having such many numbers would detriment quality of programs which is being shown. In this essay we will look at both side and I will put forward my views why I am in favor of having range of channels in a television.

To begin with the family wholesome entrainer had changed signficantly as compared to previous decades. To illustrate, today there are variety of channels, with plethora of programs. Since, consumer has this many options to choose from, the telecaster and the show producers would rather need to improve on content, story and quality of the programs to draw viewers to their show. So, it is in fact an advantageous situation as it improves the overall standard of television. On the contrary, if we have lesser number of options in television there will be monopoly and viewers will suffer by being stuck with whatever is to be offered or tele-casted. Such a scenario is not helpful for anyone as it would reduce viewership and the standard of programs.

I would argue that, having lot of channels is good cause, not everyone is similar. Each individual have own taste, moods and would like to view programs as per their requirement. For instance, today we have channels from music to catch up on latest trending chart-busters, news to be in-touch with happenings in the world, sports to follow up on your favorite games and teams, movies for relaxation and enjoyment, comedy to reduce stress. Because of this many additional benefits for an average consumer I believe it is great to have range of mediums at our disposal to cater our needs.

In conclusion, there are no drawbacks of having such many options in television. I believe viewers in general can enjoy even more because of all the various sources with improved content.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in general, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88817891374 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66556702754 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575079872204 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1144007087 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160768929297 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529050372374 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555859906034 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908045282614 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560680935735 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.