It is generally accepted that increased car use made a significant problem in big cities. Metropolitans such as Tokyo or New York are experiencing major environmental and economic problems in relation to increased automobile use. Therefore, it is commonly acknowledged that fewer vehicle uses and public transport oriented urban development would decrease the above-mentioned problems. These solutions will be discussed in this order.
Firstly, a very important factor that leads to traffic congestion is increased vehicle use. Today, automobile dependency is a concept that is of special importance. Take Tehran as an example, people consider automobiles as a power symbol and a sign shows their social level. Subsequently, it is preferred to use automobile and traffic generated due to excessive use of vehicles would force city managers to build more roads. And this cycle continues to increase the overall traffic congestion. This problem can be solved by increasing social awareness of the environmental impacts of dependency on the automobile. Thus, using other modes of transportation except cars can solve the problem of traffic to some extent.
On the other hand, city development based on public transport would have a significant effect on less automobile use. for instance, most European countries benefit from mixed land use. surprisingly, it is agreed that most people in Europe prefer to use the train for their city daily trips. So It is clear that urban design strategies would contribute to fewer traffic problems. Therefore, city managers should apply advanced planning methods to decrease traffic problems.
Following the analyzation of the effect of fewer car use and city decision maker's strategies, it is clear that the cooperation of people and authorities would lead to solving this problem. It is hoped that both sides make enough effort to solve this serious problem.
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 22
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. 78
- The recent years' sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy. For some this is a benefit, raising the profile of sports, but for others it is a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpacts of dependency on the automobile. Thus, using other modes of transportatio...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...nificant effect on less automobile use. for instance, most European countries benef...
^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Surprisingly
... countries benefit from mixed land use. surprisingly, it is agreed that most people in Europ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...n design strategies would contribute to fewer traffic problems. Therefore, city managers shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44745762712 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00369589442 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7720975127 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183613277604 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626121190037 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501225566581 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110906062621 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405276849775 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.