The provided illustration represents the longevity of life for people from different areas of Asia from 1950 and gives a prediction for it until 2300.
As a general trend, the longevity of life for all the presented areas has risen steadily since 1950. At that time, it was under 60 years old and it rose dramatically until 2000. It is still increasing now and is predicted to rise further to reach more than 100.
It is interesting to note that the number for Western Asia has jumped rapidly from about 52 in 1950, compared to roughly 45 for other china and 40 for other areas, to just under 80 in 2000. This trend is still climbing sharply and it is projected to reach higher than 100 in 2300, which is more than any other region in the presented graph.
Looking into the future, the longevity of life for all regions is predicted to grow significantly. It will improve considerably to more than 90 in 2300, while this number is noticeably higher for china and Western aria which is just under 100 and more than 100 respectively.
- The graph shows the number of fatal injuries resulting in death of workers in New Zealand between 1992 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
- the graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 61
- The chart shows the number of female and male people arrested by type of offence (crime) 78
- Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days.Why is this? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences. 67
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 41
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5752688172 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52972272229 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7889001445 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14646184859 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758749643 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644958615604 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112349935778 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629185599123 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.