The table provided compares the revenue obtained by a cafe which was located in an office building throughout a specific weekday.
As can be seen that, around 7.30 to 10.30, the shop remained busiest when drinks and food were sold in the largest amount. While during the whole opening time, coffee was the best seller among other types.
During the breakfast time 7.30-10.30, it is clear that people preferred pastries for their meals to sandwiches when sales of pastries peaked at 275, however sandwiches were sold less at only 50 in comparison with other types of food and drinks. On the other hand, at lunch time, sandwiches were the best seller, receiving 200 orders which was the highest record in a day whereas for drinks, tea suffered the least sales volume between 10.30 and 2.30.
For the next three hours, a large number of people visited the shop for pasties when its sales volume recovered to reach 150. On the contrary, tea sales steadily fell down to stood at the lowest of35 compared to coffee, a kind of drink with very positive sales at 145. Following which, sales recorded for the last threes hours before the shop closed showed a significant development in tea sales from 35 to 75, but this kind of drink still ended a day with the least volume. By contrast, coffee generated huge sales when the number reached 200 which was highest in comparison to the others.
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 84
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... and 2.30. For the next three hours, a large number of people visited the shop for pasties whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, as for, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76763485477 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25805453481 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601659751037 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1208416273 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128198451806 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612066014638 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431916313343 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877775190817 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538997125523 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.