the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009
The graphs compare the electrical amount from all resources and alternative sources in Germany and France in 2009
Overall, Fossil Coal was the dominant source exploited for electricity in G while in F, most of the electricity generated through nuclear plants. Besides, Hydroelectric was the resource that produced the biggest amount of electricity among the alternatives in F while in G, this came from both Wind and Biomass.
G depended its electricity-generation mostly on Conventional coal, making up to around 60%, which thrice as much as the amount produced by Nuclear Power at just above 20%. In France, a reverse pattern could be noticed. Nuclear power got the lion’s share, taking the leading position at 76% while Fossil Fuel was less than 6 times, at the bottom of 10,3%. Renewables were equally exploited in both countries, approximately around 15%.
As regards green fuels, the most striking feature can be seen in France Electricity Generation is Hydroelectricity, with 80,5% (1st rank), 80 times more than Solar energy. In Germany, these two sources contributed to 17,1% and 6,1% respectively. The electricity produced from Biomass was similar to wind power at about 9% an 36% in France and Germany correspondingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | jicheoltrash | 89 | view |
- the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009 89
- score by teams by season from 2002 to 2005 84
- the hobbies of British people from 2003 to 2015 78
- the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000 89
- the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30964467005 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22805923271 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659898477157 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.872629023 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333906518194 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117610754231 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139213442623 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248894089632 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182181064968 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.