Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world has developed in many aspects and people are becoming more and more clenched to their jobs and the effect of having a job in everyday life is undeniable. I disagree with the provided statement and I'm going to explain the reasons to my opinion.
To begin with, there are issues pertained to work directly and indirectly. The first issue that comes to mind is the salary. some people agree to the critical role of money in having a convenient happy life. Although others may contradict this idea and believe in the quality of life excluding the money. But surely the both sides know the necessity of having a stable income for a person to have the ability to afford home rents and food. So it is not easy to talk about losing a job through curiosity and making mistakes by taking risks. It may be wiser to keep working slowly and meticulously and avoid mistakes to make sure that you won't lose your job. You can schedule some years of painstakingly work and saving some money and then changing your job for a new more risk taking one.
As another reason to support my point of view I will explain a personal experience. I've worked in an architecture company for 5 years now and I've seen many people hired and fired through time. One characteristic about the people who have stayed for a long time in their position in this company is their focus on the details, spending enough time on solving the issues and following every single step by which they are instructed. They also have the benefit of learning new strategies and design tricks all because they spend more time and making effort to do their best job and avoid risks which could cause the company a great loss.
To sum up, I believe that keeping the best quality is more essential than working quickly and skipping the important little facts. So I would recommend anyone who has found his or her ideal job to keep it by working efficiently and meticulously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- TPO-23 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO 21 – taks 1 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 66
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...isagree with the provided statement and Im going to explain the reasons to my opin...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...issue that comes to mind is the salary. some people agree to the critical role of mo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to home'
Suggestion: to home
... a person to have the ability to afford home rents and food. So it is not easy to ta...
^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to keep working slowly and meticulously and avoid mistakes to make sure that you...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...b for a new more risk taking one. As another reason to support my point of v...
^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...w I will explain a personal experience. Ive worked in an architecture company for 5...
^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...rchitecture company for 5 years now and Ive seen many people hired and fired throug...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6098265896 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4122423374 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575144508671 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7379663657 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243609399129 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741794822847 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622480519775 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134780611046 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396799376712 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.