There are ongoing arguments about employees should be required to have a good dressing style. Some organizations are supporting this while others prefer to have good work quality instead of dressing style. I believe good looking dressing style of workers is important but also the quality of work plays a crucial role.
Today technological advances are allowing people to work at home without reaching to the company. For instance, work at home without going anywhere is more popular than a few years ago. In such conditions work quality of employees is increasing very considerably. There are a lot of facilities available in the present day where customers, co-workers and companies don't even see their employees, they are only focusing quality of work done by them. In such situations, people are not judged by their appearances.
On the other hand, some companies trying to gather their employees under one roof. They expect their employees to dress smartly and to be attractive. Organizations are very restricted to this matter because good looking is not just important however good dressing style creates an appealing working environment. By making a healthy environment in the workplace companies presume it will boost working motivation. Moreover, professional appearance when you are meeting with other companies will create an impression in a positive manner and business can also be developed in this way.
To summer up depending on categories people are working employees should be very careful how they are presenting themselves and however work quality is the most important things for customers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are ongoing arguments about employ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quality of work plays a crucial role. Today technological advances are allow...
^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ere customers, co-workers and companies dont even see their employees, they are only...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are not judged by their appearances. On the other hand, some companies tryi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...her companies will create an impression in a positive manner and business can also be developed in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can also be developed in this way. To summer up depending on categories peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, moreover, so, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3568627451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86871255553 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5062420386 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177279058276 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692473316174 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375257577335 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113630513963 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220320737452 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.