In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion.
These days, there is a vexed issue that people who,drive cars in the downtown, have to pay extra cost to cross the street around it because this cost is a policy to alleviate several problems that have been recently occurred. Exponents of this idea deliberate the extra payment as a key answer to severe traffic congestion and air pollution issue. However, the protesters consider this idea rather than dubious and disadvantageous. Apropos to this side, a road fee bring merely an exclusivity to prosperous citizens.
To them who say agree, creating a payment system at some crowded avenues could significantly reduce traffic jam as a predominant problem and shraply decrease air pollution as a side effect of it. When a road fee is implemented in certain focuses of city, it also transform the way of life of citizens. Take Electronic Road Pricing at Orchard, Singapore as an exemplification. Although at the first time they have a little misinterpretation of the new regulation on the road, people have changing the way of their mobility to this road without driving their personal vehicles which induced gridlock and unhealthy air quality jeopardize its existence. Most of those people use subway and bus as amelioration of social and environmental issue which is an enormous movement of city living.
Nonetheless, the contrary view emphasized the paid road system such an ineffective program towards fabulously affluent society. An additional cost might well alter the lifestyle of medium class society to garage their cars at home because they take the view that this cost is extortionately expensive and they realize the responsibility to create a better environment with reducing Carbon Monoxide. Ironically, while some people are avoiding to drive car and use public transportation as an alternative, wealthy people could pass the street easily with forgetting their contribution to air pollution and traffic congestion. Also, disgracefully, those rich citizens increase the volume of traffic on the road which creates an exclusive boulevard for them. This could substantiate an inequitable of paid road on the other perspective.
In conclusion, I would contend agree, the street payment system might be helpful in certain conditions, where there are virtues of implementation and straight purpose on it. Nevertheless, in actual situations, not every human being could allow their mindset to contribute to this policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Resilient Yao | 84 | view |
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drive
..., there is a vexed issue that people who,drive cars in the downtown, have to pay extra...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transforms'?
Suggestion: transforms
...ted in certain focuses of city, it also transform the way of life of citizens. Take Elect...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.85567010309 467% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 937.175257732 220% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 383.0 206.0 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37597911227 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08730589833 2.54303337028 121% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 127.690721649 175% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582245430809 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 290.88556701 224% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5133574166 44.8134815571 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6875 76.5299724578 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 4.34317383033 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188375619685 0.216113520407 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560449398225 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489692352958 0.0603063233224 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108543747047 0.12726935374 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356132400374 0.0580467560999 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 8.37731958763 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 70.7449484536 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 7.59969072165 127% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 41.2886597938 286% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.