Air pollutants in the UK

Essay topics:

Air pollutants in the UK

The line graph illustrates air pollutants caused by 3 different sources in the UK between 1990 and 2005.

Overall, the total air pollutants fell over the period shown. The most dramatic decrease was seen in industrial sources.

There was a significant fall in the total amount of air pollutants, from 7 million tonnes in 1990 to just over 3 million tonnes in 2005. In 1990, the air pollutants originated from industrial source was the highest of all, around 5.5 million tonnes. The figures for both transport and households were much lower, just under 1 million ton.

In 1999, the amount of air pollutants derived from industrial sources declined rapidly to about 2.5 million tonnes, while there was a slight fluctuation in vehicles and domestic sources. By 2005, around 2 million tonnes of air pollutants had come from industry, compared to 1 million ton and just only approximately 0.3 million ton in transport and households respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-26 Wardiati Yusuf 67 view
2024-02-26 Wardiati Yusuf 67 view
2023-09-11 huyen nguyen ngoc 67 view
2023-09-11 huyen nguyen ngoc 67 view
2023-08-26 chădu1989 40 view
Essays by user Dreamcatcher2209 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80837160871 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8132927169 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302025723991 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153294452092 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123315202465 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223752204451 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928969265182 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.