Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Education is considered as a panacea for all the life problems which students acquire in various academic levels, and this evaluation of knowledge and understanding is done by various modes to examine student’s performance. However, some advocate formal examination as an appropriate way to assess student’s performance, rather than a constant assessment of work and project. Thus, I utterly agree with this statement.
To begin with, formal examinations play a vital role in making students introspect about themselves whether they are heading towards the right direction on not, and it is the most viable method for evaluating student's performance on account of plethora reasons. Firstly, formal examinations are the best yardstick to determine someone's ability with complete accuracy, because in exams those who work hard and have some knowledge can only get success. On top of that, there cannot be an issue of copying or any kind of fraud owing to strictness and monitoring which are adopted during such exams. For instance, It has been seen that only a few people show their competency in formal examination, as a result, they become successful due to their hard work and knowledge, which is tested in such examinations.
Meanwhile, projects and assessments always remain dubious as compare to examinations due to myriad reasons. Firstly, work assignments that are submitted by students may have the probability that the content of such assignments can be copied from somewhere else, than the student's own knowledge. Notably, projects and assignments are not prepared under proper monitoring and strictness, and here one can doubt the credibility of student's capability because students can take the assistance of other people in carrying out such projects and works.
In conclusion, I opine that there should be an accurate and precise way of evaluating student's abilities and here formal examinations are the best way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-19 | kuldeep sharma | 97 | view |
- An increase in production of consumer goods result in damage of the natural environment . What are the reasons and possible solutions. 100
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important.Discuss both views and give your opinion 100
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 40
- Nowadays men's sports are given far more attention by society compared to women's sports. What are the reasons for that? Do you think is a positive or a negative development? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...er, some advocate formal examination as an proper way to access student's per...
^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owing to strictness and monitoring which adopted during such exams. For instance,...
^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnments that are submitt by students may the probability that ^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that '> such assignments can copied from somewhere else, than the stu...
^^
Line 9, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because students can take the assistance other people in carrying out such projec...
^^
Line 13, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In conclusion, I opine that there should an exact and precise way of evaluating s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63973063973 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53854914096 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1300954476 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.272727273 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.25397266985 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306099719553 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122948672232 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746723370187 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192345530553 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774468830088 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.