Happiness and its consequences
Recently, happiness and cheerful has been arguable debate among societies. Obscure joyfulness factors have distracted psychologists, scientists, monks, and sociologists to decipher the specific paths to achieve it. Diverse happiness criteria have determined such as economical satisfaction, environmental delectation, physical and mental health, political satisfaction and so on, which are out of population control. In my opinion happiness, proper Infrastructures have to be rulers' activities priority to flourish societies' pleasant.
Providing happiness facilities such as health efficiency, job opportunity, quality of local democracy and etc has been counted as the first and most significant role of governments to increase its fellows' cheerfulness. Public transportation is an inevitable necessity of the super populated cities, that not only has been considered as the best way to urban transits but would decrease suburban intellectual concerns due to their daily trips. For instance, when I was studying in Malaysia regarding their poor public transportation, I used to drive 3 hours a day from suburb<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> of </span>Kuala Lumpur to the city center to attend in my classes and I could not even concentrate on my studying, nor was I happy due to driving in the most crowded area at traffic jam time.
Plenty of revenue sources are at rulers disposal, which includes mines, seas, Forests, Underground Resources and environments, and taxes(as one of the most considerable sources of governments income which has been imposed to the people), which is rulers obligation to spend them to increase societies welfare and happiness, consequently. Researches from University of Pennsylvanian and Illinois in 2013 have illustrated that social welfare such as health amenities such as clinics, drugstores, unemployment decrements, job security and engagement and so on are directly connected to social happiness.
In conclusion, governments are responsible for their people's cheerfulness and prosperity by providing facilities and services in their country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | dr magoto | view | |
| 2022-10-10 | bali | 77 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | Behnaz fallah | 90 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | mehrdad att | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ority to flourish societies pleasant. Providing happiness facilities such as h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n style='font-size: 19.36px;'> of Kuala Lumpur to the city cente...
^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most crowded area at traffic jam time. Plenty of revenue sources are at rulers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rectly connected to social happiness. In conclusion, governments are responsib...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1207.87684729 149% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93092105263 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52341636251 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641447368421 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.57789906 50.4703680194 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.3 104.977214359 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 20.9669160288 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111747434662 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467921275972 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539861032462 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589130621883 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603715077053 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 12.6369458128 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.71 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 55.0591133005 222% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.