Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The issue that companies have a responsibility to support the health and well-being of people and the environment is a controversial matter. While some argue that a corporation's ultimate goal should be making a profit, others believe that they should also be held responsible for the well-being of others. My personal view aligns more closely with the later view for the following reasons:
To begin with, it is not always possible to enforce the law completely. Many restrictions implemented in the law can be circumvented by companies. Take Volkswagon environmental fiasco as an example. Even though law prohibiting the construction of cars with too much environmental damage was present at the time, this company, along with other companies that later accepted such an unlawful action, managed to make fake environmental test data and, therefore, passing the required standards to sell their products. If a company does not acknowledge the obligation to care for the health of people and the planet, the law might not be able to restrain it completely.
Further, even if the law is completely and appropriately enforced, it might not be perfect. There are always some spots in an industry that are not included in the law. For example, Shell company has left many of its old, obsolete facilities in the middle of the ocean to erode and sink over time because there is no law requiring oil companies to clear the ocean from their old devices and facilities. While the law cannot be perfect, it is imperative that companies feel this obligation to care about the health of others.
On the other hand, the law is the only tool available for forcing these responsibilities on companies. Corporations, like VolksWagon, Shell, and others, will always seek their profits, and they cannot be really trusted to comply with these responsibilities volunteer ally. Whether it seems moral or not, big corporations have always proved themselves to be likely to harm people and the environment to make even scantly more profit. Hence, more restrictive and comprehensive laws should be passed to make sure companies have no escape from regulations and restrictions.
Ultimately, this issue has many different aspects that should be considered. Acknowledging social and environmental responsibilities by corporations is helpful where the law is imperfect or cannot be effectively enforced. But that responsibility itself might be needed to be imposed by the law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | aria_9 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | mojammel1501114 | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 55
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 42
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region expe 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue that companies have a responsi...
^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a corporation' or simply 'corporations'?
Suggestion: a corporation; corporations
...roversial matter. While some argue that a corporations ultimate goal should be making a profit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he later view for the following reasons: To begin with, it is not always possib...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be able to restrain it completely. Further, even if the law is completely a...
^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: HELL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'she'll'?
Suggestion: She'll
...e not included in the law. For example, Shell company has left many of its old, obsol...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o care about the health of others. On the other hand, the law is the only t...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from regulations and restrictions. Ultimately, this issue has many differen...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 28, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ons. Ultimately, this issue has many different aspects that should be considered. Ackn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26649746193 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14148099339 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530456852792 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4773786222 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.277777778 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303885817391 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103210304231 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813119757387 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186184903869 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971554946663 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.