The charts compare the spending of an average American household on six different types of products or activities in 1998 and 2008.
The given pie chart illustrates the spending habits of an American families on six different commodities in year 11998 and 2008.
Overall, from the graph, it can be made out that American families had opted for spending lavishly on two main products such as clothing and durable goods cumulatively in 1999 and 2008.
In year 1998, the American families has spent their maximum income amounting to 17% on electronic goods, followed by clothing at 12%. While the American families spent their income about 8% on vacations and 6% on eating. Also around 3% percent of equal earnings is utilized for purchasing newspapers/magazines as well as on going to cinemas.
The year 2008 has witnessed the repeated trend on spending the maximum amount of income on electronic goods, followed by clothing at 17%. While the families speeding on eating is 6% and money spent on going on holidays is 5%.
From year 1999 to 2008, there is a considerable increase in spending on clothes and electronic goods. While there is 3% sharp decrease in people spending on holidays and there is slight decrease on spending in eating over the nine years. On the contrast, there is no spending on going to cinema and purchasing newspapers/magazines
- Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people s lives do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 75
- Certain personal qualities cannot be achieved through university studies Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and relevant examples 72
- Agricultural Production and Consumption in Canada. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government responsibility.Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it.Discuss both views and give your own examples. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
...ates the spending habits of an American families on six different commodities in year 11...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly on two main products such as clothing and durable goods cumulatively in 1999 a...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erican families spent their income about 8% on vacations and 6% on eating. Also ...
^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...out 8% on vacations and 6% on eating. Also around 3% percent of equal earnings is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...chasing newspapers/magazines as well as on going to cinemas. The year 2008 has witness...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., followed by clothing at 17%. While the families speeding on eating is 6% and mo...
^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...peeding on eating is 6% and money spent on going on holidays is 5%. From year 1999 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and electronic goods. While there is 3% sharp decrease in people spending on hol...
^^
Line 11, column 278, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
.... On the contrast, there is no spending on going to cinema and purchasing newspapers/mag...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05392156863 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96838719985 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9579004764 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211640668792 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855138716264 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865755508705 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136766770161 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959739944749 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.