A long-distance flight consumes the same amount of fuel and causes the same amount of pollution as a car does in several years. Some people think that to reduce environmental problems, we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourist air travel, instead of limiting the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environment issues, particularly air pollution, become increasingly severe in our world. There has much debate about whether or not non-essential flights, as a important cause of air pollution and a waste of natural resources, should be discouraged, such as tourist air travel instead of limiting cars. I tend to agree some non-essential flights could be abolished, but it dose not mean definitely that we should cancel tourist air travel and stop limiting usage of private cars.
First of all, it is no doubt that long-distance fights consume much fuel and lead to air pollution, as well as cars. As a result, consuming fuel constantly puts a severe strain on natural resource, which may not only cause environmental issues but also affect the world economy because of the increasing higher fuel costs. In addition, exhaust fumes from flights pollute the air which cause global climate change, and also threaten humans’ healthy. Therefore, it is very crucial to solve the environmental issues by all possible ways including discouraging non-essential flights.
However, there is no persuasive definition of non-essential flights. In other words, I do not think tourist air travel is non-essential any more. Economic prosperity and technological progress contribute to more and more people travelling around world by airplanes. Air travel is the most fast and convenient way for long distance tourism, which saves traveller’s time cost and relaxes indeed. Moreover, tourist air travel is more significant for our world rather than air travellers as individuals. People from different cultures worldwide could get more chances to know each other by airplane, which is an essential way of world economy and culture interaction.
Furthermore, environmental issues, even air pollution, do not result from a single factor. There are many other more serious reasons like car fumes. As the development of public transportation in my countries, limiting the use of private cars would be more effective and efficient than tourist air travel.
Overall, for the reasons mentioned above, I tend to agree that we should do our best to address environmental issues, but it is not a positive way to be discouraged tourist air travel instead of limiting the use of private cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | thutienbui0210 | 57 | view |
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust journalists. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- A long distance flight consumes the same amount of fuel and causes the same amount of pollution as a car does in several years Some people think that to reduce environmental problems we should discourage non essential flights such as tourist air travel in 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... our world. There has much debate about whether or not non-essential flights, as a important c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hether or not non-essential flights, as a important cause of air pollution and a ...
^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
...tial flights could be abolished, but it dose not mean definitely that we should canc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39722222222 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08205554104 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4076328805 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.294117647 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325785202473 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109035398698 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545488805233 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179319699624 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583993782456 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.