TPO17
Both, the reading and the lecture, talk about the influence that have had the human population increment, the agriculture, and the use of pesticides over the number of birds in the usa. The reading claims that they have affected them negatively and its effect will continue in the future. On the other hand, the professor explains that the arguments used in the text are questionable and refute each reason, casting doubts in the author's beliefs.
Firstly, the reading points out that the enlargement of the cities have destroyed birds habitats. However, the lecturer disproves this argument by saying that, the urban development does not affect all birds species. there are some species, such as falcons and hawks, that have prospered in the urban environment, due to the increment of their preys. Furthermore, there are others species that have adapted well to live in the cities. As a result, there is not a generalized declining of all species of birds.
Secondly, the text argues that, as a consequence of the rise in the human population, more lands will be used for agriculture, which reduce birds’ habitat. Nonetheless, the orator contradicts this argument by noticing the food demand increment will be covered using more productive crops, not with an expansion in the agriculture areas. moreover, the orator affirm that, actually, in the usa those areas have suffered a contraction over the years.
Finally, the reading remarks that, owing to the factors mentioned before, the pesticide utilization will increase too. Notwithstanding, the professor highlights the weakness of this point noticing that it is erroneous to project that assumption toward the future. The need of pesticide will fall thanks to the use of new and more resistant crops, which reduce the need of pesticide. moreover, in the future there will be a development of less toxic pesticide that won’t harm animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | eeemmmyyy | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sahar90o | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | aldovega0516 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Mostafa93106325 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 21- Integrated essay 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- The best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team 3
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ment does not affect all birds species. there are some species, such as falcons and h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... an expansion in the agriculture areas. moreover, the orator affirm that, actually, in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ps, which reduce the need of pesticide. moreover, in the future there will be a developm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pesticide that won't harm animals.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26384364821 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80554182735 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543973941368 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3971192135 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339980391763 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979206077545 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665244800301 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189597192936 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464947342493 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.