In the rapid urbanization affective skilled parents are must essential for growing kids up. Brining them up is not easy for parents, that is why myriad smart training courses are available for helping parents. Partly, I am agreeing with the idea, but I also believe that there are Plethora ways instead of expensive training.
Firstly, modern training courses are pay an essential role in their parenthood. They can learn about infant holding, infants, feeding kids, even pay way also. All that needful knowledge protects progeny generation parents from huge difficulties. For example, in UAE government hospitals began several trainings for newly mothers. Furthermore, not only about general training but also health base courses are available nowadays. For instance, developed country JAPAN giving training about baby’s bones and blood circulation to mothers.
On the other side, internet can be a strong hand for new parents. If may not be able to go training, they can get knowledge from websites. To illustrate, smartphone is now in everyone hand with internet connection. So, parents can watch training videos by sitting home. Moreover, unlimited free of cost advice from other couples are also can be helpful. In addition, experience is sometimes more than theorical knowledge. So, grandparents’ knowledge is also useful. To highlight, there are lot of park where experiences parents are showing their experience with others.
In conclusion, a nation can be strong by growing children strong. Therefore, I believe that not matter how it is, the crucial thing is bringing kids up.
- governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 73
- Most people prefer ready to eat food rather than homemade food now.Do you think it has more advantages or more disadvantages? 61
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...vailable for helping parents. Partly, I am agreeing with the idea, but I also believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ways instead of expensive training. Firstly, modern training courses are pay...
^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ng, infants, feeding kids, even pay way also. All that needful knowledge protects pr...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and blood circulation to mothers. On the other side, internet can be a str...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...howing their experience with others. In conclusion, a nation can be strong by...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.448 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85142490695 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9705997931 49.4020404114 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.6842105263 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1578947368 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25382907033 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067996076828 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595871641992 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147358572702 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591939969712 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.44 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.